A new ruling emphasizes that copyright laws protect only human-made art, leaving AI-generated works without any legal ...

A federal appeals court ruled that art created autonomously by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, saying that at ...

A dubious “Van Gogh” has sparked a battle between technology, connoisseurs, and the high-stakes art market. What does AI, ...

The emergence of AI-generated artwork is noticeable in both creative and professional settings. Employees in engineering use ...

By Blake Brittain A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial ...

People tend to want the creative content they consume—be it music, visual art, or literature—to be the work of a human rather ...

Artificial Intelligence (AI) performs impressively, but much of it is based on human work that was taken without payment. The ...

As AI continues to evolve, Stanley encourages artists to focus on their craft, trust in their skills, and embrace the ...

A U.S. federal appeals court today ruled that art created solely by artificial intelligence cannot be granted copyright protection.

While AI tools like Microsoft’s Copilot offer promising efficiencies, they cannot replace the deeply human process of ...

The author writes "The U.S. Copyright Office has long maintained that copyright protection extends only to works exhibiting ...

March 18 - A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.