The ingredients in Subway's tuna are "not tuna and not fish," an attorney for the plaintiffs says.

Given the recent controversies and legal troubles Subway has faced over this matter, does the restaurant currently serve real tuna in its menu items?

The lawsuit does not state what it believes the tuna is actually made out of. Subway has been part of other strange lawsuits, including one claiming the footlong was not actually a foot long.

To settle that big class-action lawsuit about exaggerating the size of its sandwiches, Subway has agreed to start measuring them. Nation’s Restaurant News got a look at the proposed deal, which ...

‘I swear I paid $18:’ Subway customer’s video on the ‘$5 footlong’ goes viral ‘Go look at how much the cost is for a foot-long tuna.’ ...

Is Subway really serving tuna? It's hard to know for sure says a scientist, but knowing could shed light on the pervasive, dangerous issue of mislabeled fish.

Case Background: Amin had claimed that Subway’s tuna sandwiches, salads, and wraps included other species of fish, chicken, pork, and cattle, or no tuna at all.

It started with a claim that Subway's tuna wasn't fish. A fishy lawsuit which quickly received coast to coast coverage in the USA due to the sensational headlines as sub editors had a field day.

The lawsuit does not state what it believes the tuna is actually made out of. Subway has been part of other strange lawsuits, including one claiming the footlong was not actually a foot long.

In suburban Washington, for example, the price of a foot-long tuna sandwich at a Subway outlet costs $7.39. The same size cold-cut combo sandwich, by contrast, runs $6.19.