But an ongoing lawsuit aimed at the fast-food sandwich king — Subway — suggests we should be a little choosier about who we get our tuna fish from. The contents of these sandwiches may not be ...

The New York Times had 60 inches of Subway tuna sandwiches from three different ... in a lawsuit reported earlier this year, alleging the fish is made from "a mixture of various concoctions ...

Subway describes its tuna sandwich as “freshly baked bread ... “We found that the ingredients were not tuna and not fish,” the attorney said in an email to The Washington Post.

a Subway spokesperson insisted on the integrity of its fish sandwich, stating, "Subway serves 100% tuna." Of Judge Tigar's ruling, they added, "We are disappointed the Court felt it couldn't ...

Then, as now, Subway disputed the allegations, saying the fish in its sandwiches is 100 percent wild-caught tuna. What’s more, in December, the company’s lawyers filed a motion asking U.S ...

After the Subway tuna sandwich legal battle raged on for several ... First, the tuna business is quite regulated, and the fish is tested regularly, and second, Rema Foods provides Subway with ...

Will the fish taste fresh enough ... now a page on the Subway website dedicated to talking about its tuna. Subway's tuna sandwich was inoffensive but unmemorable. The best thing I can say about ...