Having noticed the three judgments of this Court in Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani (supra), Man Kaur (supra) & A.C. Narayanan (supra), we are of the view that in view of Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, ...

We find that the observations of this Court in Sebastiani Lakra (supra) distinguishing the case of Shashi Sharma (supra) clearly applies to the case in hand. It is observed that the amount of Rs.

activities, by allegedly diverting the Plaintiff‟s business and clientele, are liable to be restrained by an order of ad interim ex-parte injunction to prevent further loss and damage to the Plaintiff ...

15. The Apex Court in Sheela Devi v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax [MANU/ID/0285/2022] held that, notice issued against a dead person is null and void and all consequent proceedings/orders ...

1. The Petitioner has approached this Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Award dated 22.08.2017 passed by the learned Arbitrator allowing the claims of ...

We propose to address four problems frequently faced in motor accident claim cases under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ('Act' for short). 2. The first problem relates to a section of motor accident ...

But, it appears to us that a counterclaim has necessarily to be directed against the plaintiff in the suit, though incidentally or along with it, it may also claim relief against co-defendants in the ...

Legitimate dissent or criticism cannot be equated with sedition or antinational acts. For instance, in cases involving Section 124A (sedition) of the repealed IPC, casual or rhetorical statements did ...

The argument of Ms. Uttara Babbar, learned senior counsel is that no DNA test was carried out. No doubt, the DNA test was not carried out and it would have been better for the prosecution to have done ...

“Certainly, it is a primary principle that the accused must be and not merely may be guilty before a court can convict and the mental distance between ‘may be’ and ‘must be’ is long and divides vague ...

Ext.P2 order is erroneous and unsustainable in law.

We have heard both the learned counsel appearing for theparties at length and we do not think that the order of the High Court is sustainable for the simple reason that there was not even an iota of ...