The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rights holders.

The judge rules that replicating human-authored content without permission does not qualify as 'fair use' of AI under ...

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Thomson Reuters has won an early battle in court over the question of fair use in artificial ...

As Wired notes, the judgment blows a hole in the AI industry’s fair use defense. The industry has used fair use (the same ...

A US judge has ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters in a AI training fight against Ross Intelligence, a legal AI startup, ...

Legal experts said there are key differences in Thomson Reuters' case against Ross Intelligence and other major AI-related ...

After reconsidering the case, the judge issued a partial summary judgement, which asks whether a non-generative AI system’s ...

In an early test case for copyright holders bringing claims related to content used to train artificial intelligence, a ...

The ruling, which reserved a 2023 order denying Thomson Reuters a summary judgement, found that ROSS’ use of Westlaw data did ...

A judge looked at possible copyright infringement defenses for Ross Intelligence and said, ‘I reject them all.’ ...

A judge ruled Ross Intelligence copied Westlaw data without permission, in a blow to AI developer's fair use claims.

HOW ‘FAIR USE’ WORKS. The fair use doctrine exists to safeguard freedom of expression and to create an environment that ...