Anthropic didn't violate U.S. copyright law when the AI company used millions of legally purchased books to train its chatbot ...

Tech companies are celebrating a major ruling on fair use for AI training, but a closer read shows big legal risks still lay ...

Anthropic has received a mixed result in a class action lawsuit brought by a group of authors who claimed the company used ...

A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that training an AI model on copyrighted works without specific permission to do so was not a violation of copyright law. U.S. District Judge William Alsup ...

A federal judge in San Francisco ruled late on Monday that Anthropic's use of books without permission to train its artificial intelligence system was legal under U.S. copyright law.

While the startup has won its "fair use" argument, it potentially faces billions of dollars in damages for allegedly pirating ...

Vance Boelter was preoccupied with societal problems and how he could fix them to serve the greater good, according to some ...

Following the launch of my kSuite, its free package designed to offer a sovereign email service and online workspace, the Swiss cloud provi ...

Embracing AI is not inherently wrong, but claiming authorship or ownership over what is essentially a machine-generated remix of human labour is not only a misreading of copyright law—it is an ...

It mostly exists to register materials for copyright and advise members of Congress on copyright issues. Experts and insiders used words like "stable" and "sleepy" to describe the agency. Not anymore.

"That part is extremely weird," said Dave Hansen, the executive director of the Authors Alliance, a group which argues for less strict copyright laws. "I don't think they've ever done that before." By ...