In 2008 the International Cricket Council ran a trial using Hawk-Eye for referring decisions to the third umpire if a team disagreed with an LBW decision, and the technology went on to become a ...

Gould had ruled Tendulkar lbw off Ajmal in the 11th over, but the replays showed that the ball pitched in line but according to Hawk Eye the ball was missing leg stump. So the decision was overturned.

Hawk-Eye accepts that ball tracking for the delivery in question did not reflect the path of the actual delivery that had been sent up for review | ESPN.in ...

England captain Ben Stokes sparked controversy by claiming that the technology was “wrong” when it gave Zak Crawley out in a crucial moment before England slipped to a series-levelling 106-run ...

As many cricket fans would know, a Leg-Before Wicket (LBW) ... For instance, if less than 50% of the ball is hitting the stumps as per the Hawk-Eye trajectory prediction, ...

Hawk-Eye's officials clarified later, as four cameras were used instead of six and the fact that Masood's bat and the square-leg umpire obscured a couple of frames in the trajectory of the ...

For hundreds of years the umpire's word had been law in the game of cricket, until one afternoon in the summer of 2001, when umpire Pete Watts turned to the pavilion in Little Chart with a ...