An AI company’s fair use defence in a copyright legal battle filed by Thomson Reuters has been rejected by an American judge.

After reconsidering the case, the judge issued a partial summary judgement, which asks whether a non-generative AI system’s ...

The judge rules that replicating human-authored content without permission does not qualify as 'fair use' of AI under ...

HOW ‘FAIR USE’ WORKS. The fair use doctrine exists to safeguard freedom of expression and to create an environment that encourages learning and innovation. To that end, in man ...

Thomson Reuters has won the first major AI copyright case in the United States, reports Kate Knibbs of Wired. Knibbs reports, “In 2020, the media and technology conglomerate filed an unprecedented AI ...

A US judge has ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters in a AI training fight against Ross Intelligence, a legal AI startup, ...

Thomson Reuters has won a victory against AI start-up Ross Intelligence for its use of copyrighted data to train its own AI ...

Nicole Gill of Cozen O'Connor discusses the need for attorneys to be aware of new software applications their clients use and ...

The ruling, which reserved a 2023 order denying Thomson Reuters a summary judgement, found that ROSS’ use of Westlaw data did ...

Media giant wins partial summary judgment in non-genAI dispute | ROSS Intelligence copied editorial content from Westlaw ...

The case, filed in 2020, accused Ross Intelligence of reproducing materials from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal research ...

Thomson Reuters has won a major copyright victory as a judge ruled that a competitor using its work to train an AI tool was not fair use.